Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 44F of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 applied to the transfer of shares made before declaration of dividends, so as to treat the resulting amount as taxable income.
Analysis: Section 44F was directed against deliberate avoidance of tax by means of devices or artifices in relation to securities, including bond-washing transactions. The controlling test was whether the assessee had intentionally adopted a transaction to avoid tax on real income, rather than merely arranged affairs so as to reduce liability. On the findings, the assessee had transferred the shares before the dividends were declared and had divested itself of the source of income. The transfers were genuine transactions, not a sham device by which income still remained effectively with the transferor. A mere reduction in tax liability, without avoidance of income by an artifice, was insufficient to attract the section.
Conclusion: Section 44F was not applicable, and the amount of Rs. 94,775 was not taxable in the assessee's hands.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 44F applies only where there is deliberate tax avoidance by an artificial or mala fide device in respect of securities; a genuine transfer made before income accrues, resulting only in a lawful reduction of tax liability, does not attract the section.