Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a female member of a Hindu undivided family can blend her self-acquired immovable property with the joint family property, and if not, whether the declaration can nevertheless operate as a gift so that the income from the transferred half-share is assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family.
Analysis: Blending under Hindu law requires a coparcener's capacity to share property into the joint family stock in a manner that does not exclude the transferor from joint ownership. A female member of a Hindu undivided family is not a coparcener and does not possess the right to demand partition or to claim survivorship in the same manner as a male coparcener. On that footing, she cannot impress her separate immovable property with the character of joint family property by blending. The attempt to treat the transaction as a gift also failed, because a gift of immovable property requires a registered instrument, and no statutory fiction was shown that would dispense with that requirement. The earlier authorities relied upon did not support a contrary position on these facts.
Conclusion: The female assessee had no right to blend the immovable property into the Hindu undivided family stock, and the declaration could not operate as a valid gift. The entire income from the property was rightly assessed in her hands.