TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Affirms Turnover Estimates for Entry Tax Liability</h1> The Court modified the Tribunal's decision, affirming the first appellate authority's turnover estimate at Rs. 40 lac and Rs. 50 lac for purchase and ... Validity of assessment orders - rejection of books of accounts of the revisionist - it was seen that the revisionist has evaded the purchase and sale of his transaction and has evaded the payment of tax and he has further considered that since the survey was conducted in the month of August 2013, the estimate of undisclosed sales cannot be over and above of ₹ 50 lac - Held that:- The order of the Tribunal is modified to the extent that the purchase and sale at ₹ 40 lac. and 50 lac. respectively, as estimated by the first appellate authority, is correct - this Court affirmed the order passed by the first appellate authority and accordingly, the order of the Tribunal is modified. Revision allowed in part. Issues involved:1. Rejection of books of accounts by assessing authority and imposition of additional tax liability.2. Appeal before the Additional Commissioner (Appeal) and subsequent reduction of estimated turnover.3. Second appeal before the Commercial Tax Tribunal, Moradabad and the decision rendered.Detailed Analysis:1. The revisions were directed against the Tribunal's order dated 17.2.2018, where the assessing authority rejected the books of accounts of the trader, leading to the imposition of additional tax liability amounting to Rs. 9 lac. The first appellate authority reduced the estimated turnover of evaded purchase and sales, fixing the tax liability at Rs. 4,50,000. The Tribunal estimated the evaded turnover at Rs. 50 lac and Rs. 60 lac for purchase and sale, respectively, with additional tax liability of Rs. 1 lac.2. The first appellate authority upheld the rejection of books of account based on adverse material found during a survey but found the assessing authority's estimate excessive. The estimate was reduced to Rs. 40 lac and Rs. 50 lac for evaded purchase and sales, respectively. The Tribunal allowed the department's appeal in part and dismissed the trader's appeal. The Tribunal's estimate was challenged based on reasons recorded and discrepancies in the tax invoice book.3. The Tribunal's decision was modified by the Court, affirming the first appellate authority's estimate of turnover at Rs. 40 lac and Rs. 50 lac for purchase and sale, respectively. The Court upheld the order regarding liability of entry tax, modifying the Tribunal's decision accordingly. The revisions were allowed in part due to the reduced turnover estimate and the affirmation of the first appellate authority's order.In conclusion, the judgment addressed issues related to the rejection of books of accounts, imposition of tax liability, appeal proceedings, turnover estimation, and the modification of the Tribunal's decision by the Court based on the facts and circumstances of the case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
