Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (6) TMI 1500 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessment Order Quashed Due to Invalid Special Audit Direction The Tribunal quashed the assessment order on the grounds that the direction for a special audit under Section 142(2A) was invalid, rendering the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessment Order Quashed Due to Invalid Special Audit Direction

                          The Tribunal quashed the assessment order on the grounds that the direction for a special audit under Section 142(2A) was invalid, rendering the assessment time-barred. As a result, the assessment order based on the special audit was also deemed invalid and barred by limitation. The Tribunal's decision led to the deletion of additions made by the AO on account of deemed dividend and interest paid to Tata Reality Infrastructure Ltd, as the entire assessment order was quashed due to the invalid special audit direction.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Jurisdictional validity of the special audit direction under Section 142(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Validity of the assessment order based on the special audit.
                          3. Deletion of additions made by the AO on account of deemed dividend.
                          4. Deletion of additions made by the AO on account of interest paid to Tata Reality Infrastructure Ltd.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Jurisdictional Validity of the Special Audit Direction under Section 142(2A):

                          Assessee's Argument:
                          The assessee contended that the direction for a special audit under Section 142(2A) was unwarranted and issued merely to extend the time limit for a time-barred assessment. It argued that there was no complexity in the books of accounts, and the direction for a special audit was issued without jurisdiction. The assessee relied on the precedent set by the ITAT in the preceding assessment year (2009-10), where a similar direction was quashed, and the assessment was declared time-barred.

                          Revenue's Argument:
                          The Revenue argued that the appointment of a special auditor cannot be challenged before the Tribunal and that the remedy lies elsewhere. It contended that the special audit was necessary due to the complexity and volume of transactions, and the interest of the revenue.

                          Tribunal's Analysis:
                          The Tribunal noted that the facts in the current assessment year (2010-11) were similar to those in the preceding year (2009-10). The Tribunal observed that the direction for a special audit was given at the fag end of the limitation period, indicating that it was done to extend the time for passing the assessment order. The Tribunal found that the order appointing the special auditor did not spell out any reasons exhibiting the complexity of the accounts and was a non-speaking order. The Tribunal held that the direction for a special audit was illegal, invalid, and not in accordance with the law, and therefore, the assessment order was barred by limitation.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal quashed the assessment order on the preliminary ground that the direction for a special audit under Section 142(2A) was invalid, and the assessment was time-barred.

                          2. Validity of the Assessment Order Based on the Special Audit:

                          Assessee's Argument:
                          The assessee argued that the assessment order based on the special audit was invalid as the direction for the special audit itself was without jurisdiction.

                          Tribunal's Analysis:
                          The Tribunal concurred with the assessee's argument and held that since the direction for the special audit was invalid, the assessment order based on it was also invalid and barred by limitation.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal quashed the assessment order as it was based on an invalid direction for a special audit.

                          3. Deletion of Additions Made by the AO on Account of Deemed Dividend:

                          Revenue's Argument:
                          The Revenue contended that the DRP erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 54,64,23,410/- on account of deemed dividend without appreciating the provisions of Section 2(18) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and Section 3(1)(iii) of the Companies Act, 1956.

                          Tribunal's Analysis:
                          The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail as it quashed the entire assessment order on the preliminary ground of invalidity of the special audit direction.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal's decision to quash the assessment order rendered this issue redundant.

                          4. Deletion of Additions Made by the AO on Account of Interest Paid to Tata Reality Infrastructure Ltd:

                          Revenue's Argument:
                          The Revenue contended that the DRP erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 16,75,28,379/- on account of interest paid to Tata Reality Infrastructure Ltd.

                          Tribunal's Analysis:
                          Similar to the issue of deemed dividend, the Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail as it quashed the entire assessment order on the preliminary ground of invalidity of the special audit direction.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal's decision to quash the assessment order rendered this issue redundant.

                          Final Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on the preliminary ground that the direction for a special audit under Section 142(2A) was invalid and quashed the assessment order as time-barred. Consequently, the Revenue's appeal and cross-objection were dismissed as redundant.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found