CESTAT Hyderabad: Postal Charges Excluded from Taxable Value

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the appellant assessee in Appeal No. ST/756/2009, allowing the appeal and rejecting Appeal No. ST/592/2009. The Tribunal held that the Postal and Telegraph Charges were reimbursement of actual expenses and should not be included in the gross value of services rendered for tax purposes, citing legal precedent. The decision was based on established legal principles, affirming the appellant's position and providing a clear resolution to the service tax liability issue.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the assesses are liable to pay service tax on Postal and Telegraph Charges (P & T charges) recovered from their customers/account holders.

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad dealt with two appeals raising a common question of law regarding the liability of assesses to pay service tax on Postal and Telegraph Charges (P & T charges) collected from customers/account holders. The Revenue filed Appeal No. ST/592/2009 against Order-in-Appeal No. 27/2009, while the appellant bank filed Appeal No. ST/756/2009 against Order-in-Appeal No. 33/2009. The Tribunal heard both sides and examined the records to determine the issue at hand. It was established that the assesses contended that the charges in question were reimbursement of actual expenses incurred during business operations, while the Revenue argued that these charges should be included in the gross value of services rendered and taxed. The Tribunal noted that the assesses' claim regarding the nature of the charges was undisputed, and it was affirmed that the charges were recovered on an actual basis from customers/account holders.

The Tribunal referred to a relevant decision by the Apex Court in the case of Union of India and ANR. Vs. M/s Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrats Pvt. Ltd., where it was held that reimbursable expenses cannot be included in the consideration for services rendered. Based on this legal precedent and the factual matrix of the case, the Tribunal concluded that the issue was no longer open to debate. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order in Appeal No. ST/592/2009, rejecting the appeal filed by the Revenue. Similarly, the Tribunal found the impugned order in Appeal No. ST/756/2009 unsustainable and set it aside, allowing the appeal of the appellant assessee. In summary, Appeal No. ST/756/2009 was allowed, while ST/592/2009 was rejected.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad, comprising Mr. M.V. Ravindran and Mr. P. Venkata Subba Rao, resolved the issue of service tax liability on Postal and Telegraph Charges in favor of the appellant assessee based on established legal principles and precedents, thereby providing a clear and decisive judgment on the matter.

---