Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a dealer may seek revision of returns beyond the statutory period when no penal proceedings are pending, and whether a possible claim to input tax credit can be used to deny such revision.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003 permits revised returns in specified contingencies and within prescribed time limits, but the prohibition is directed only against revision where penal proceedings or proceedings for detected evasion have already been initiated. The time-limit provisions are enabling in character and do not create an absolute bar against a bona fide request to correct omissions or mistakes when no penal action is pending. A voluntary attempt to rectify returns and pay the correct tax should not be rejected merely because the statutory period has elapsed, provided the request is not intended to defeat penal consequences. The possibility that a revised return may later support a claim for input tax credit cannot, by itself, justify refusal of revision if the claim is otherwise bona fide.
Conclusion: Revision of returns was held to be permissible in the absence of pending penal proceedings, even if sought beyond the prescribed period, and the assessees were entitled to have their revised returns accepted.