TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court upholds disallowance of deductions under Section 80IB in Tax Case Appeals</h1> <h3>The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Versus M/s. Elegant Estates</h3> The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Versus M/s. Elegant Estates - [2018] 407 ITR 425 (Mad) Issues:1. Challenge to common order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by Revenue.2. Disallowance of deduction under Section 80IB for two assessment years.3. Interpretation of Clause (f) of sub-section 10 of Section 80IB.4. Eligibility of assessee for deduction under Section 80IB.5. Prospective application of amendment to Section 80IB.6. Entitlement to deduction for sale of flats to related persons.7. Factual findings regarding actual sale dates.8. Limitations on right of appeal to High Court.9. Precedent set by a Division Bench judgment.Analysis:The High Court of Madras dealt with Tax Case Appeals filed by the Revenue challenging a common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeals arose from disallowance of deductions under Section 80IB for two assessment years due to the sale of flats to related individuals. The case centered on the interpretation of Clause (f) of sub-section 10 of Section 80IB, which prohibits the allotment of residential units in a housing project to certain related persons. The Appellate Commissioner allowed the appeals, emphasizing that the actual sale of the flats occurred before the amendment to Section 80IB in 2010, making the amendment prospective in nature.The key issues revolved around the eligibility of the assessee for deduction under Section 80IB and the retrospective application of the statutory amendment. The Tribunal's decision to dismiss the Revenue's appeals was based on the factual finding that the sale of flats took place prior to the legislative change, rendering the amendment inapplicable to the transactions. The High Court concurred with this view, highlighting that the right of appeal to the High Court is limited to substantial questions of law.Furthermore, the Court referenced a Division Bench judgment that addressed the issue of deduction under Section 80IB for flats purchased before the statutory amendment. The Court noted that as a Bench of co-ordinate strength, they were bound by the precedent set in the earlier judgment, which supported the position taken in the present case. Ultimately, the appeals were dismissed, emphasizing that the matter was settled by existing legal principles and precedents.
TaxTMI 