Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the correspondence dated 2 December 1969 between the two continuing partners could be treated as a fresh instrument of partnership for registration of the firm under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The relevant statutory scheme requires the firm to be evidenced by an instrument and the instrument must specify the individual shares of the partners. A partnership deed need not be confined to a single formal document if the terms of the partnership are clearly evidenced by a set of contemporaneous documents or correspondence that together constitute the instrument of partnership. On the facts, the letter dated 2 December 1969 recorded the reduced number of partners and their revised profit-sharing ratios, and there was no legal impediment to treating it as part of the partnership instrument. The contention that a fresh formal deed alone could satisfy the requirement was rejected.
Conclusion: The letter dated 2 December 1969 was rightly treated as a fresh instrument of partnership, and a further formal deed was not necessary for registration.
Ratio Decidendi: For registration of a firm, the partnership may be evidenced by one document or by several contemporaneous documents or letters taken together, provided they constitute a genuine instrument specifying the partners and their shares.