1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Rectification of Order Granted by Appellate Tribunal</h1> The application for rectification of a mistake in the order was granted by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI. The correct order number was confirmed as ... Rectification of Mistake application - Held that:- There is a mistake in the preamble of the order in mentioning the order number. Accordingly, in the preamble, the appeal arising out of 'Order-in-Appeal No. AV(119)/95/2013 dated 25.4.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Aurangabad' is corrected and may be read as 'Order-in-original No. 34/CEX/COMMR/2013 dated 18.10.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Aurangabad' - ROM application allowed. The application was for rectification of a mistake in the order dated 30.11.2017. The correct order number should be 'Order-in-Original No. 34/CEX/COMMR/2013 dated 18.10.2013.' The correction was made, and the ROM application was allowed. (Judgement: Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI, Citation: 2018 (6) TMI 984 - CESTAT MUMBAI)