TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court Upholds Treatment of Donations & Income Allocation</h1> <h3>COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS) Versus AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION</h3> COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (EXEMPTIONS) Versus AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION - TMI Issues:1. Whether donations received with a stipulation for future use can be treated as income in the year of receiptRs.2. Whether unspent donations designated for a specific charitable purpose in the next financial year can be considered as current liabilitiesRs.Analysis:1. The main issue in this case was whether donations received by the respondent-Assessee, with the condition that part of the money would be utilized for a specified charitable purpose in the next financial year, should be treated as income in the year of receipt. The Tribunal considered the fact that the donations were received with a stipulation for their use over a period of time extending into the succeeding year. The Tribunal held that only the portion of the donation pertaining to the year under consideration should be treated as income for that year, while the balance should be allocated to the next financial year. The Tribunal emphasized that when donations are received with specific conditions for utilization over a period of time, the income should be divided proportionately based on the stipulated use, following a conservative accounting policy. The Tribunal concluded that the treatment of the donations by the assessee was proper and consistent with the conditions of the donations, upholding the decision of the CIT (Appeals) and dismissing the appeals of the Revenue.2. The second issue revolved around whether the unspent donations, earmarked for a specific charitable purpose in the next financial year, could be classified as current liabilities. The Appellate Authorities agreed that the unspent amount of donations, intended for utilization in the subsequent financial year, was correctly categorized as 'current liabilities' in the books of accounts at the end of the financial year. Consequently, the unspent donations could not be considered as income of the charitable trust for the year under consideration. The High Court concurred with the findings of the Appellate Authorities, stating that there was no substantial question of law in the appeals filed by the Revenue. The Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, noting that the treatment of the donations as current liabilities was in line with the consistent accounting practice followed by the assessee.In conclusion, the High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities regarding the treatment of donations received with stipulations for future use and the classification of unspent donations as current liabilities.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
