Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest was payable under Rule 7(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on differential duty already paid before finalisation of provisional assessment, and whether the interest amount was refundable.
Analysis: The assessment was provisional because the assessable value depended on fluctuating material cost and overheads. The differential duty had been paid by the assessee before the final assessment was completed, so no duty remained payable on finalisation of the provisional assessment. In view of the Tribunal's earlier orders in the assessee's own cases, and the principle that where two views of High Courts are available the construction favourable to the assessee must be adopted, the levy of interest was not sustainable. The amount paid as interest was therefore liable to refund.
Conclusion: Interest under Rule 7(4) was not payable on the facts of the case, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the amount paid.