Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether transportation of food grains under the Public Distribution System by a contractor without issuance of a consignment note constitutes service by a goods transport agency and attracts service tax.
Analysis: The transportation was undertaken on the direction and control of the District Supply Officer in the course of the Public Distribution System. The essential statutory feature of a goods transport agency is the issuance of a consignment note. On the facts, the document issued by the District Supply Officer was not a consignment note, and the contractor did not acquire lien over the goods during transit. The activity, therefore, did not satisfy the statutory definition of goods transport agency service. The view was consistent with the earlier Tribunal decision relied upon in the order.
Conclusion: The appellant was not liable to service tax as a goods transport agency, and the demand could not be sustained.