TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Chennai Upholds CIT(A) Decision on Sections 14A and 43B Disallowance, Emphasizes Court Judgments (A)</h1> <h3>The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 1 (1), Chennai Versus M/s Auromatrix Hotels P Ltd.</h3> The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 1 (1), Chennai Versus M/s Auromatrix Hotels P Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.2. Disallowance under Section 43B of the Act in respect of employees' contribution.Issue 1: Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961:The appeal was against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -1, Chennai, for the assessment year 2012-13. The disallowance under Section 14A was challenged. The assessee had not earned any exempted income. The CIT(Appeals) relied on the judgment of the Madras High Court in Redington (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT and deleted the disallowance. The Tribunal upheld the decision, stating that since the CIT(Appeals) followed the judgment of the jurisdictional High Court, which is binding, there was no reason to interfere with the lower authority's order.Issue 2: Disallowance under Section 43B of the Act in respect of employees' contribution:The next ground of appeal was regarding the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 43B of the Act concerning employees' contribution. The CIT(Appeals) allowed the claim of the assessee based on the judgment of the Madras High Court in CIT v. Industrial Security and Intelligence India (P.) Ltd. It was noted that the employees' contribution was deposited before the due date for filing the return of income. Consequently, the Tribunal confirmed the decision of the lower authority, stating that there was no reason to interfere with the order.In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai. The judgment highlighted the importance of following relevant court judgments and emphasized the binding nature of decisions made by the jurisdictional High Court. The Tribunal's decision was based on the adherence to legal provisions and precedents set by higher courts.
TaxTMI 