Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 was available in respect of a house deemed to pass on death under section 9 where, after the gift, the deceased remained only in permissive occupation.
Analysis: Section 9 creates a statutory fiction by deeming certain gifted property to pass on the deceased's death, but the exemption under section 33(1)(n) is conditioned by the house or part thereof belonging to the deceased and being exclusively used by him for his residence at the time of death. Earlier residential use before the gift is immaterial. On the findings recorded, the property had been gifted, possession had been delivered, the deceased had no reserved right of user, and his continued stay was only by sufferance. Exclusive user as residence contemplates user as of right, not mere permissive occupation. In any event, the record did not establish exclusive use by the deceased at the relevant time.
Conclusion: The exemption under section 33(1)(n) was not available. The question was answered in the negative and against the accountable person.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, the house must be exclusively used by the deceased for his residence at the time of death, and mere permissive occupation or prior residential use does not satisfy the statutory condition.