Change of Cause Title Granted in Service Tax Dispute Appeal

The appellant's miscellaneous application for a change of cause title was allowed, altering the jurisdiction and address. The case involved a service tax dispute related to renting immovable property, resulting in a liability of Rs. 7,11,745. The appellant remitted Rs. 5,48,664 after audit officers identified the liability. Despite the Revenue's show-cause notice and penalties, the appellant's appeal to the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I) was unsuccessful. The forum directed a review of interest computation and set aside penalties under Section 76 & 77, citing the appellant's pre-notice tax payment and lack of contestation as reasonable causes.

---

---

Issues: Change of cause title, Service tax liability, Interest computation, Penalty under Section 76 & 77

Change of Cause Title:
The judgment addresses a miscellaneous application for a change of cause title due to a change in jurisdiction and address of the respondent. The application is allowed, changing the jurisdiction and address from CST Chennai-I to The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Chennai North Commissionerate.

Service Tax Liability:
The appellant, an individual providing taxable service under "Renting of Immovable Property," faced a dispute regarding service tax for the periods from April 2012 to March 2013 and April 2013 to March 2014. The appellant received rental income, leading to a service tax liability of Rs. 7,11,745. After audit officers pointed out the liability, the appellant remitted Rs. 5,48,664 on two different dates. The Revenue issued a show-cause notice proposing the service tax demand along with interest and penalties. The appellant did not reply to the notice, leading to the adjudicating authority confirming the demand, interest, and penalties. The appellant's appeal to the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals-I) was unsuccessful, resulting in the appeal to the forum.

Interest Computation:
The appellant contested the interest computation, claiming it was incorrect and should align with the computation provided to the forum. The forum directed the adjudicating authority to verify the computation as per the appellant's submission and demand the correct amount if not paid by the appellant.

Penalty under Section 76 & 77:
Regarding penalties under Section 76 & 77, the appellant argued that payment of 80% of the tax amount before the notice and the absence of collecting service tax from tenants established a reasonable cause. The appellant cited specific cases and provided ledger copies to support the claim. The Revenue contended that the admission of liability warranted penalties. The forum invoked Section 80, noting the appellant's payment before the notice and lack of contesting the tax liability. Consequently, the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority and confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) were set aside, and the appeal was disposed of accordingly.

---