Tribunal Remands Appeals for Timely Filing Verification

The Tribunal allowed the appeals by remanding the matter back to the lower appellate authority to verify the timely filing within the maximum period of 90 days. The appeals were found to be filed within the combined 90-day period, comprising the 60-day filing period and an additional condonable period of 30 days under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The importance of adhering to prescribed time limits for filing appeals and the possibility of condonation within the specified period were emphasized.

---

---

Issues:
1. Time limitation for filing appeals before the Commissioner (Appeals) under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Analysis:
The case involved multiple appeals with a common dispute regarding the payment of additional duty of Customs equal to excise duty (CVD) on imported tyre scrap intended for manufacturing Crumb Rubber Powder or Crumb Rubber Modified Bitumen. The appellants paid the CVD under protest and filed appeals against the assessments. The lower appellate authority rejected the appeals as being filed beyond the prescribed period, including the period of condonation.

During the hearing, the appellant's advocate argued that the relevant date for calculating the prescribed period should be from the dates when the duty payment was made for the concerned Bills of Entry. The advocate contended that appeals filed within 53 days and 69 days from the payment dates were within the prescribed period of 60 days, with the 9 days delay in the latter case being condonable under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. The advocate requested a remand to re-examine the relevant dates for each appeal separately.

The opposing party, the Assistant Commissioner (AR), supported the impugned orders rejecting the appeals as time-barred. After hearing both sides, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument. It was noted that all eight appeals had been filed within the combined period of 90 days, comprising the 60-day filing period and the additional condonable period of 30 days under Section 128 of the Customs Act, 1962. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the lower appellate authority to verify the appellant's contentions regarding the timely filing of appeals within the maximum period of 90 days from the relevant date in each case. If the contentions were found to be correct, the appeals were to be heard and disposed of on merits, with reference to a decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in a relevant case.

In conclusion, the appeals were allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the prescribed time limits for filing appeals under the Customs Act, 1962 and the possibility of condonation within the specified period.

---