Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016 despite prosecution for an offence falling under Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code.
Analysis: The Scheme excluded persons against whom prosecution was pending for offences punishable under Chapter IX or Chapter XVII of the Indian Penal Code and certain specified enactments. The petitioner's grievance that the denial order referred to the Prevention of Corruption Act did not alter the legal position, because the criminal case also involved Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, which falls within Chapter XVII. Once prosecution for such an offence existed, the exclusion clause operated against the petitioner.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not eligible for the benefit of the Income Declaration Scheme, 2016, and the challenge to the denial of declaration failed.