Tribunal grants CENVAT credit on inputs and capital goods, overturning disallowance order

The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, granting CENVAT credit on both inputs and capital goods used in the manufacturing process, based on established legal precedents and specific rulings cited during the proceedings. The impugned order disallowing a portion of the credit was set aside, and the appellant was entitled to the CENVAT credit on inputs like lubricants and explosives as well as on capital goods used in the captive mines forming an integrated unit with the cement factory.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against rejection of CENVAT credit on inputs and capital goods used in mines.

Analysis:

Issue 1: CENVAT credit on inputs (lubricants and explosives)
The appellant availed credit on inputs and capital goods used in manufacturing clinker and cement. The Order-in-Original disallowed a portion of the credit, leading to the appeal. The counsel argued that the issue of allowing credit on such inputs has been settled by various decisions of the Tribunal, High Court, and Supreme Court, citing cases like Japee Rewa Cement vs. CCE, MP and Madras Cements Ltd. vs. CCE, Chennai. The Tribunal referred to the decision in Vikram Cement vs. CCE, Indore, where the Supreme Court allowed credit on inputs like explosives and lubricating oils. The Tribunal, considering the submissions and precedents, allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order.

Issue 2: CENVAT credit on capital goods used in mines
Regarding the CENVAT credit on capital goods used in mines, the Tribunal referred to the case of Vikram Cement vs. CCE, Indore, where the Supreme Court differentiated between captive mines and non-captive mines. If the mines are captive, forming an integrated unit with the cement factory, the credit on capital goods is available. In the present case, it was established that the mines were captive. Relying on the precedents and the specific ruling, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to the CENVAT credit on capital goods used in the captive mines. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if any.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, granting CENVAT credit on both inputs and capital goods used in the manufacturing process, based on established legal precedents and specific rulings cited during the proceedings.

---