Partnership Firm Wins Time-Barred Refund Claim Appeal | Service Tax | Judicial Precedents

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the refund claim for service tax paid by a partnership firm engaged in construction was not time-barred. The appellant's claim of &8377; 76,64,734/- was partially granted, with a refund of &8377; 39,65,384/- approved, based on judicial precedents supporting refund claims due to mutual mistakes between the assessee and the tax department. The Tribunal held that the claim, filed within one year of a circular clarifying non-liability for service tax, was within the limitation period as per Section 11B of the CEA, 1944. The case was remanded for reconsideration within the limitation period and on merit.

---

---

Issues:
- Refund of service tax
- Time limitation for filing refund claim

Refund of service tax:
The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in construction and sale of residential apartments, paid service tax on construction-related advances from buyers. Subsequently, a circular clarified that builders are not liable for service tax on flats sold to consumers directly. The appellant filed a refund claim of &8377; 76,64,734/- on 01/05/2009. The Assistant Commissioner rejected part of the refund claim on the ground of time limitation. The Commissioner(Appeals) partially allowed the appeal, granting a refund of &8377; 39,65,384/- and rejecting the balance amount of &8377; 36,69,348/- as time-barred. The appellant challenged this decision, arguing that the refund claim was within the limitation period as per Section 11B of the CEA, 1944, and relied on judicial precedents supporting refund claims based on mutual mistakes between the assessee and the department.

Time limitation for filing refund claim:
The appellant contended that the rejection of the refund claim as time-barred was unjustified, citing judicial precedents such as the decision of the Bombay High Court in In House Productions Ltd. Vs. CST, Mumbai, and the Supreme Court's ruling in Sunrays Engineers Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Jaipur. These cases emphasized that the limitation period for filing refund claims should be calculated from the date of clarification by the relevant authority regarding the applicability of tax. The Tribunal concurred with the appellant's argument, stating that the refund claim filed within one year of the circular clarifying the non-liability of service tax was within the limitation period. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the case back to the original authority for reconsideration of the refund claim within the limitation period and on merit, following the principles established in the cited judicial decisions.

(Order was pronounced in Open Court on 16/04/2018)

---