TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows appeal for advertising agency, emphasizing duty paid inputs & commercial usability of structures.</h1> <h3>JC Decaux Advertising India Pvt. Ltd. Versus CST (Adj.), Delhi</h3> JC Decaux Advertising India Pvt. Ltd. Versus CST (Adj.), Delhi - TMI Issues:Dispute over Cenvat credit availed by an advertising agency under the category of capital goods/inputs during the financial year 2011-2012.Analysis:The appellant, an advertising agency, was involved in various activities such as outdoor advertising and promotion of services and goods of clients. They were paying service tax and availing Cenvat credit on inputs, capital goods, and input services. The dispute arose when the department disallowed the credit availed by the appellant under the category of capital goods/inputs during the financial year 2011-2012. The appellant filed an appeal against the Order-in-Original No. 92/2016 dated 17.7.2014. The Tribunal noted that the appellant used various types of duty paid inputs essential for the provision of advertising services, such as display panels, stainless steel box, power meter, electrical equipment, steel framework, mobile toilets, and police booth. These items were considered necessary for the display of advertisements by the appellant, and the denial of credit on these items was found to be unjustifiable. The Tribunal emphasized that the structures in question, like BQS, were not immovable capital assets but were made of materials like stainless steel tubes and angles. These structures were used for commercial exploitation by the appellant for advertising services and could be relocated easily. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal based on the earlier order and the nature of the disputed items.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, emphasizing the essential nature of the duty paid inputs used for advertising services and the commercial usability and relocatability of the structures in question. The decision was based on the findings that the items in dispute were not immovable capital assets but necessary materials for the provision of advertising services, warranting the allowance of Cenvat credit for the appellant.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
