Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on inputs and capital goods used by an advertising agency for bus queue shelters and similar display structures, and whether such structures could be treated as immovable property so as to deny credit.
Analysis: The dispute concerned credit taken on duty-paid materials used to create advertising structures and related facilities during the relevant period. The earlier decision in the appellant's own case for an identical period had held that items such as steel tubes, angles, panels, electrical equipment and similar materials were essential inputs for providing advertising services and could not be denied credit merely by treating the resulting structures as immovable. The structures were found to be capable of relocation and were used for commercial exploitation in the course of advertising services. Following that reasoning, the denial of credit on the ground that the bus queue shelters were immovable structures was not sustainable.
Conclusion: Credit was admissible and the denial of Cenvat credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.