TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands case for re-examination of activities & contracts for tax liability under BAS category.</h1> <h3>M/s Auto Links Enterprises (I) Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi</h3> M/s Auto Links Enterprises (I) Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Delhi - TMI Issues:1. Whether the commission received by the appellant from banks/NBFCs is liable to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS) category.2. Whether the activity of the appellant falls under BAS or 'Renting of Immovable Property Service.'Analysis:The appellant, an authorized dealer of a car manufacturer, facilitated banks and NBFCs in sanctioning loans for customers. The dispute arose regarding the liability of service tax on the commission received by the appellant. Both authorities held the commission as taxable under BAS. The appellant argued they only provided space for banks/NBFCs to conduct financing activities, not acting as agents. The Tribunal referred to the decision in M/s Pagariya Auto Center vs. CCE, Aurangabad, laying down guidelines for BAS classification. The AR contended that the appellant actively promoted loans, justifying the tax demand.The Tribunal examined the contracts between the appellant and banks/NBFCs to determine BAS liability. Citing the Larger Bench's observation in Pagariya Auto Center, the Tribunal emphasized the need for a careful analysis of transactional documents for rational classification. The Tribunal concluded that a re-examination was necessary based on the nature of activities and contracts with banks/NBFCs. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter remanded for denovo proceedings, allowing the appellant to present their case.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, directing a thorough re-examination of the appellant's activities and contracts with banks/NBFCs to determine the liability under the BAS category. The decision highlighted the importance of scrutinizing transactional documents for accurate classification and rational tax determination, following the guidelines set by the Larger Bench's decision in similar cases.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
