TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules no service tax on spares under warranty & extended warranty premiums</h1> <h3>ABT Ltd. Versus CCE, Coimbatore, Chandra Automobile India Pvt. Ltd. And Sree Saradhambal Automobiles P. Ltd.</h3> ABT Ltd. Versus CCE, Coimbatore, Chandra Automobile India Pvt. Ltd. And Sree Saradhambal Automobiles P. Ltd. - TMI Issues:Service tax on amounts received by dealers from manufacturers for spares used during warranty and extended warranty service; Service tax on extended warranty premium collected by dealers from buyers.Analysis:The appeals dealt with the issue of service tax demands raised by the Revenue on amounts received by authorized dealers from manufacturers for spares used during warranty and extended warranty service. The dealers, authorized by manufacturers like Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and Hyundai Motor India Pvt. Ltd., provided services during the warranty period, with costs and spares reimbursed by the manufacturers. The extended warranty premium collected from buyers was remitted to manufacturers. The department issued show cause notices, alleging service tax liability on these amounts. The authorized dealers contended that the spare parts were sold with VAT paid, hence excluding them from service tax. They argued that the extended warranty premium was already subject to service tax paid by the manufacturers.Upon hearing both sides and examining sample invoices, the Tribunal found that spare parts were indeed sold with VAT paid, leading to the exclusion of spare parts costs from service tax. The Tribunal determined that the service tax demand on spare parts was unjustified and set it aside. Regarding the extended warranty premium amounts, the Tribunal noted that these were not reimbursements for spare parts by the manufacturers, as the manufacturers had already paid service tax on the premium amounts. Consequently, the Tribunal found no basis for demanding service tax on the extended warranty premium and set aside this demand as well.In conclusion, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief. The Tribunal's decision clarified that spare parts costs during warranty and extended warranty service were not subject to service tax, given the VAT payments made by the dealers. Additionally, the Tribunal found no grounds to impose service tax on extended warranty premium amounts, as the manufacturers had already paid the applicable service tax on these premiums.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
