Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court stresses timely filing for Section 80-IB deductions, rejects post-filing compliance arguments.</h1> <h3>Suolificio Linea Italia (India) (P) Ltd. Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 8, Kolkata</h3> Suolificio Linea Italia (India) (P) Ltd. Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 8, Kolkata - [2018] 407 ITR 16 (Cal) Issues:1. Claim for benefit under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 denied due to late filing of return.2. Interpretation of Section 80AC of the Act and its impact on claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.3. Applicability of previous judgments on the current case.4. Consideration of the Supreme Court judgment in CIT v. Kulu Valley Transport Co. P. Ltd.5. Relevance of filing returns within the specified due dates under Section 139(1) for claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.Analysis:1. The judgment addresses the issue of the appellant's claim for the benefit under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 being declined due to the late filing of the return. The condition for obtaining deductions under Section 80-IB is that the return for the relevant year should be filed within the time prescribed under Section 139(1) of the Act. The appellant's contention was that the returns were filed at a belated stage but in compliance with Section 139(4) of the Act. However, the Court emphasized that the condition imposed by Section 80AC of the Act specifically refers to Section 139(1) and not to Section 139 as a whole, highlighting the importance of timely filing of returns for claiming deductions.2. The interpretation of Section 80AC of the Act was crucial in this case. The Court noted that the provision imposes an embargo on conferring benefits under Section 80-IB if the return is not filed within the due date specified under Section 139(1). The Court rejected the appellant's argument that once the returns are filed and taken on record, the condition stipulated in Section 80AC would be deemed complied with. The judgment relied on previous decisions to support its interpretation, emphasizing the strict adherence to the statutory requirements for claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.3. The Court considered previous judgments, including an unreported judgment and a reported case, to analyze the legal issue raised by the appellant. While acknowledging the differing views in previous cases, the Court relied on the judgment in Shelcon Properties P. Ltd. to dismiss the appeal at the admission stage. The Court found that the legal issue raised was directly covered by the precedent set in Shelcon Properties P. Ltd., indicating a consistent approach in interpreting the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.4. The judgment also delved into the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Kulu Valley Transport Co. P. Ltd., which highlighted the significance of filing returns within the extended period provided by the statute. However, the Court distinguished the applicability of the Kulu Valley Transport judgment in cases where a benefit is conferred under specific conditions, as in the case of Section 80-IB of the Act. The Court emphasized that the strict wording of Section 80AC necessitates timely compliance with the filing requirements under Section 139(1) for claiming deductions under Section 80-IB.5. The Court's analysis underscored the importance of adhering to the statutory provisions, especially concerning the filing of returns within the specified due dates under Section 139(1) of the Act. The judgment emphasized that the express prohibition in Section 80AC, coupled with the negative wording, leaves no room for considering the extended period permitted under Section 139(4) to claim the benefit under Section 80-IB. The Court's decision to dismiss the appeal highlighted the significance of strict compliance with the statutory conditions for claiming deductions under the Income Tax Act.This comprehensive analysis of the judgment provides a detailed insight into the legal issues addressed by the Court regarding the denial of benefits under Section 80-IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 due to the late filing of returns and the interpretation of relevant statutory provisions.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found