Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods, found in mixed condition, were required to be mutilated as a condition for provisional release, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration in light of subsequent reports.
Analysis: The majority held that the goods substantially fell within the declared scrap description and the relevant ISRI specification, and that the conditions imposed for mutilation were unwarranted. It was found that the later reports did not justify sending the matter back to the original authority, and that provisional release could be granted on the declared value and bond conditions without mutilation. The differing opinion viewed the subsequent material as requiring re-examination by the adjudicating authority, but that view did not prevail in the final majority decision.
Conclusion: The condition of mutilation was set aside and the goods were directed to be released provisionally on the modified terms stated by the majority, without remand.