Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim protection should be granted against the disqualification notices issued under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013, and whether directions were warranted to enable compliance under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.
Analysis: The writ petition raised serious questions regarding disqualification of directors and striking off of the company, including compliance with the notice requirements under Section 248(1) and the relevant Rules. Pending adjudication of those questions, the Court found it appropriate to maintain the status quo by protecting the petitioners from the impugned disqualification notices. The Court also balanced equities by permitting compliance under the scheme through hard copies, directing deposit of fees in court, extending the time for compliance for the petitioners, and preserving the filings subject to further orders.
Conclusion: Interim stay was granted against the disqualification notices, the DINs were directed to be revived, and the petitioners were permitted to proceed with scheme compliance in the manner directed.