Speaking order requirement: non-reasoned appellate confirmation set aside and matter remanded for fresh decision.

An appellate order confirming a demand without dealing with the appellant's other submissions was held not to be a speaking order. Reliance only on the Board Circular and valuation provisions, without recording independent reasoning or addressing rival contentions, failed the requirement of a reasoned decision. Because fairness and natural justice required proper consideration of the case, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision after affording due opportunity and passing a speaking order.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellate order was a speaking order and whether the matter was liable to be remanded for fresh decision.

Analysis: The appellate authority had confirmed the demand by relying only on the Board Circular and the relevant valuation provisions, while ignoring the appellant's other submissions. As no consideration of the rival contentions or independent reasoning was recorded, the order lacked the characteristics of a reasoned order. In such a situation, fairness required the matter to be reconsidered after affording proper opportunity and following the principles of natural justice.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed by way of remand for passing a speaking order.

---