TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petitioner's Challenge Becomes Ineffective as GST Authorities Withdraw Seizure and Penalty Notices</h1> <h3>Surendra Steel Supply Company Versus State of U.P. And Another</h3> The HC dismissed the writ petition after the GST authorities withdrew the seizure and penalty notices, rendering the legal challenge moot and effectively ... Withdrawal of seizure order - Section 129(1) of the U.P.GST Act - penalty notice under Section 129(3) of the Act - no cause of action survives to the petitioner and the petition is rendered infructuous - petition dismissed. The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after the seizure notice and penalty notice under the U.P.GST Act were withdrawn by the Assistant Commissioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
