Cenvat credit disallowance remanded for fresh adjudication after evidentiary gaps were found to need reconsideration.

Cenvat credit on capital goods and input services was denied for lack of supporting evidence, but the Tribunal found that the evidentiary gap required fresh examination because the purchases were routed through the Circle Telecom Store Depot and the receiving unit cited communication and personnel constraints. In the interest of justice, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication with a reasoned order. The entitlement to credit and the equal penalty were not finally decided on merits and were left open for fresh determination by the adjudicating authority.

---

---

Issues: Whether the disallowance of Cenvat credit and the equal penalty should be sustained, or the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The appellant's claim to Cenvat credit on capital goods and input service was rejected below for want of supporting evidence. The Tribunal noted that the purchases were made through the Circle Telecom Store Depot and the receiving unit sought to explain the evidentiary gap as arising from lack of communication and absence of concerned personnel. In these circumstances, and in the interest of justice, fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority was warranted.

Conclusion: The appeal was allowed by way of remand, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was sent back for de novo adjudication and a reasoned order.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was not finally decided on merits of entitlement to credit or penalty, and both issues were left for fresh determination by the adjudicating authority.

---