Tribunal upholds service tax demand with reduced penalty; challenge dismissed due to lack of evidence.

The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand against the Appellant but allowed for a reduced penalty of 25% under section 78 if the remaining demand and penalty were paid within 30 days, leading to the waiver of the remaining penalties. The Appellant's challenge regarding calculation errors was dismissed due to insufficient evidence, although a significant portion of the demand had already been paid. The appeal was partly allowed based on the modification of the impugned order.

---

---

Issues:
1. Service tax demand based on balance sheet and bank statements.
2. Calculation errors in service tax demand.
3. Eligibility for small scale exemption.
4. Justification for variation in data.
5. Evidence produced to dispute service tax demand.
6. Reduction of penalty under section 78.

Analysis:
1. The Appellant, registered under service tax for "Management, Maintenance and Repair Service," received a show cause notice alleging non-payment of service tax amounting to Rs. 42,28,754 for the period 2007-08 to 2011-12 based on a comparison of balance sheet and bank statements. The demand was confirmed by the adjudicating authority and upheld by the Appellate Commissioner, leading to the present appeal by the Appellant.

2. The Appellant's advocate argued that the demand was calculated using bank statements and invoices, resulting in an excess demand due to errors in tax rates. It was highlighted that the Appellant was eligible for small scale exemption in four out of the five years under review. The advocate contended that the demand lacked a proper basis, emphasizing discrepancies in the data used for calculation. The Appellate Authority's rejection of their contentions was challenged, citing discrepancies in taxable values and the Appellant's compliance with filing returns.

3. The revenue, represented by the Assistant Commissioner, supported the impugned order, stating that the Appellant failed to provide justification for the discrepancies between bank statements and invoices. The lack of contrary evidence and documentary support from the Appellant led to the confirmation of the demand.

4. Upon review, the Tribunal noted the Appellant's dispute regarding the service tax computation but found a lack of evidence presented to demonstrate any anomalies in the demand calculation. The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand but acknowledged that a significant portion of the demand had already been paid. Citing a Supreme Court decision, the Tribunal allowed the Appellant to pay a reduced penalty of 25% under section 78 if the remaining service tax demand and penalty were paid within 30 days, resulting in the waiver of the remaining penalties. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the appeal was partly allowed.

---