Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the VAT/Sales Tax amount retained by the assessees to the extent of 99% was liable to be included in the assessable value for determination of central excise duty, and whether the matter required fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The dispute arose from the industrial incentive scheme under which the assessees collected VAT/Sales Tax from customers and retained a substantial portion, while 1% was deposited with the State Exchequer. The adjudication below had included the retained amount in assessable value. A coordinate bench had already remanded an identical issue in earlier cases for decision afresh. Following that approach, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was sent back for reconsideration, with liberty to admit fresh evidence in accordance with law and after granting reasonable opportunity.
Conclusion: The issue was not finally decided on merits; the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for de novo decision, in favour of the assessees to that extent.