Tribunal upholds service tax demand on Business Support Services, waives penalty under section 76

The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on the appellants' activities falling under Business Support Services. The penalty under section 76 was waived due to the appellants' genuine belief, while the penalty under section 77 and the confirmed demand with interest remained unchanged.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the activities of the appellants fall within the category of Business Support Services under section 65(104c) of the Finance ActRs.
2. Whether the appellants were liable to pay service tax for the services provided to insurance companiesRs.
3. Whether the penalties imposed under sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act were justifiedRs.

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The appellants argued that their activities should be categorized under Insurance Auxiliary Service rather than Business Support Service, as they were appointed as corporate agents for the insurance companies. They contended that the charges received were reimbursement expenses, and the liability to pay service tax lay with the insurance companies. However, the definition of Business Support Service included infrastructural support services, such as providing office utilities, internet, and telephone facilities. The tribunal found that the charges received for providing such infrastructural facilities clearly fell within the definition of Business Support Service as per section 65(104c). Therefore, the demand for service tax was upheld.

Issue 2:
The appellants further argued for the waiver of penalties, claiming a genuine belief that their activities did not fall under Business Support Service. They maintained that the insurance companies were responsible for paying the service tax. The tribunal acknowledged the appellants' consistent plea and their failure to pay service tax based on a bonafide belief. Consequently, the penalty under section 76 was set aside, while the demand confirmed along with interest and penalty under section 77 remained unchanged.

Conclusion:
The tribunal upheld the demand for service tax on the appellants' activities falling under Business Support Services. However, considering the appellants' genuine belief and consistent plea regarding the service tax liability, the penalty under section 76 was waived, while the penalty under section 77 and the confirmed demand with interest remained unchanged.

---