Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods detained under the GST enactments were liable to be released pending adjudication, and within what time the adjudication was to be completed.
Analysis: The detention arose under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the corresponding Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. The Court followed the earlier Division Bench direction in the identical matter, which required expeditious completion of adjudication and permitted release of the detained goods on compliance with Rule 140(1) of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. In that background, the Court directed the competent authority to complete adjudication within one week from production of a copy of the judgment and ordered release of the goods forthwith upon compliance with Rule 140(1).
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to provisional release of the detained goods on compliance with the prescribed rule, and the authority was required to complete adjudication within the stipulated time.