Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after detention of goods and payment of tax and penalty demanded under section 129, a direction could be issued to complete the adjudication within a fixed time.
Analysis: The goods were detained under section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act and the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act. Since the petitioner had already remitted the tax and penalty demanded for release of the goods, the remaining grievance related to delay in completing the adjudication. In the circumstances, a time-bound direction for completion of adjudication with an opportunity of hearing was considered appropriate.
Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by directing the first respondent to complete the adjudication within one month after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.