Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the hall marking scheme and the charges collected thereunder constituted an Intellectual Property Right service liable to service tax.
Analysis: The taxable entry for Intellectual Property Right service applies only where there is transfer of, or permission to use, an intellectual property right. The hall mark used under the BIS scheme was found to be only a quality assurance mark indicating conformity to standards, and not an intellectual property right belonging to the appellant. The judgment further noted that the mark was protected under the BIS framework and that the appellant was not granting any trade mark-type licence or permission for use of an intellectual property right. The levy had therefore been founded on an incorrect understanding of both the statutory entry and the nature of the hall mark.
Conclusion: The activity did not amount to provision of Intellectual Property Right service, and the service tax demand was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A quality mark used for statutory certification and consumer protection does not become an intellectual property right merely because its use is regulated or unauthorized use is punishable; service tax under the Intellectual Property Right service entry applies only where a real intellectual property right is transferred or licensed.