Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a show cause notice demanding duty could be issued during the pendency of provisional assessment under the Central Excise Rules, and whether the impugned demand could survive when the assessment was finalised thereafter.
Analysis: The goods were cleared under provisional assessment, supported by bond and bank guarantee, and the assessment was later finalised with payment of differential duty. The show cause notice, however, had been issued while the provisional assessment was still pending. In such circumstances, settled precedent treated the issuance of the notice during the pendency of provisional assessment as impermissible. The validity of the demand therefore failed at the threshold.
Conclusion: The show cause notice was held to be bad in law and unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A demand notice issued during the pendency of provisional assessment is not sustainable where the assessment has not yet been finalised in accordance with the statutory procedure.