Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether unabsorbed depreciation had to be given priority over deduction under Section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 while computing gross total income for the purposes of Chapter VI-A, and whether the deficiency under Section 80J could be carried forward beyond the period permitted by the proviso to Section 80J(3).
Analysis: The statutory definition of gross total income under Section 80B(5) requires the total income to be computed in accordance with the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961 before any deduction under Chapter VI-A is made. On that basis, unabsorbed depreciation has to be set off first, and only thereafter can the gross total income for Chapter VI-A be determined. The limitation on carrying forward deficiency under the proviso to Section 80J(3) was therefore correctly applied in rectification proceedings under Section 154.
Conclusion: Unabsorbed depreciation had priority over the Section 80J deduction, and the rectification disallowing carry forward beyond the statutory limit was upheld in favour of the Revenue.