Tax Tribunal allows Cenvat credit for security services but seeks more evidence for other benefits The Tribunal held that renting of immovable property is a taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994, allowing the appellant to claim Cenvat credit on ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tax Tribunal allows Cenvat credit for security services but seeks more evidence for other benefits
The Tribunal held that renting of immovable property is a taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994, allowing the appellant to claim Cenvat credit on service tax paid for security agency service. The Tribunal remanded the issue of benefit under Notification No.24/2007-ST for verification due to lack of evidence. The benefit under Notification No.6/2005-ST was denied as the appellant did not press for it. The appeal was disposed of with directions for further verification by the original authority.
Issues: 1. Availability of Cenvat credit on service tax paid for security agency service. 2. Benefit of Notification No.24/2007-ST dated 22.05.2007 regarding property tax. 3. Benefit of exemption under Notification No.6/2005-ST dated 01.03.2005.
Analysis: 1. The appellant, engaged in providing taxable services, claimed Cenvat credit on service tax paid for security agency service. The Department contended that renting of immovable property is not a service, thus service tax on security agency service should not be available as Cenvat credit. The Tribunal held that renting of immovable property is a taxable service under the Finance Act, 1994. Citing a previous case, the Tribunal dismissed the Department's reliance on a circular, stating that the denial of Cenvat credit was unjustified. The appellant was deemed entitled to the Cenvat benefit on service tax paid for the security agency service.
2. Regarding the benefit of Notification No.24/2007-ST dated 22.05.2007, the appellant had not provided documentary evidence before the original authority. The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of Service Tax demand due to lack of evidence. However, acknowledging the appellant's claim that they can produce the required documents, the matter was remanded to the original authority for verification. The Tribunal directed the original authority to examine whether property tax was paid by the appellant and if it qualified for abatement as per the Notification dated 22.5.2007.
3. The appellant did not press for the benefit of exemption under Notification No.6/2005-ST dated 01.03.2005. The Tribunal upheld the denial of this benefit as per the adjudication order. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, with the Tribunal directing the matter back to the original authority for further verification as per the above decisions.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
