Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (4) TMI 792 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Capital Gain Calculation for Residential Property Sale The Tribunal affirmed the Assessing Officer's calculation of long-term capital gain under section 50C for the sale of a residential property, based on ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Upholds Capital Gain Calculation for Residential Property Sale

                            The Tribunal affirmed the Assessing Officer's calculation of long-term capital gain under section 50C for the sale of a residential property, based on stamp value. The CIT (A) upheld the assessment, emphasizing the correctness of adopting market value for gain calculation. The appellant's appeal was dismissed as the property's rate was not proven lower than circle rate. The Tribunal found valuation errors due to the tenant's occupancy impact. Allegations of forceful sale were considered, leading to a revised valuation. The assessment under sections 148/143(3) and 147 was challenged, resulting in a remittance for fresh consideration. Non-compliance with section 50C requirements necessitated a new assessment for proper valuation.




                            Issues:
                            1. Calculation of long term capital gain under section 50C
                            2. Confirmation of order by CIT (Appeal)-1
                            3. Valuation of property for stamp purposes
                            4. Allegations of forceful agreement signing and property sale
                            5. Assessment under sections 148/143(3) and 147
                            6. Compliance with section 50C requirements

                            Issue 1: Calculation of long term capital gain under section 50C
                            The Assessing Officer (AO) calculated long-term capital gain under section 50C for the sale of a residential property. The AO assessed the gain at Rs. 32,86,722 based on the stamp value of Rs. 42,83,000 and the sale consideration of Rs. 12,00,000. The total income was assessed at Rs. 33,31,720. The CIT (A) affirmed this assessment, stating that the AO correctly adopted the market value as per Stamp Duty valuation for calculating the gain under section 50C.

                            Issue 2: Confirmation of order by CIT (Appeal)-1
                            The CIT (A) dismissed the assessee's appeal, noting that the AO had referred the property valuation to the departmental valuation officer under section 50C(2) but the DVO returned the matter due to lack of information from the assessee. The CIT (A) found that the appellant failed to prove that the property's rate was lower than the circle rate for stamp duty valuation. The grounds taken by the appellant were thus dismissed.

                            Issue 3: Valuation of property for stamp purposes
                            The assessee sold a property to a tenant for Rs. 12,00,000, while the stamp value was Rs. 42,83,000. The AO referred the valuation to the DVO, who returned it due to insufficient information. The appellant argued that the property's value was affected by the tenant's long-term occupation and low rent. The Tribunal found that the DVO did not consider these aspects, leading to an incorrect valuation under section 50C.

                            Issue 4: Allegations of forceful agreement signing and property sale
                            The appellant claimed that other individuals forced the sale of the property at a nominal price, leading to a forceful agreement signing. However, after discussing with the tenant, the property was sold for Rs. 12,00,000. The Tribunal considered the circumstances and found the valuation by the AO to be excessive due to the unique situation surrounding the sale.

                            Issue 5: Assessment under sections 148/143(3) and 147
                            The AO issued a notice under section 148 for the assessment year 2007-08 based on information received. The assessment was completed under section 143(3) with a total income of Rs. 33,31,720. The appellant challenged the assessment under sections 148 and 147, arguing it was wrong, illegal, and bad in law. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the AO for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

                            Issue 6: Compliance with section 50C requirements
                            The Tribunal found that the AO did not comply with the requirements of section 50C for property valuation. The DVO returned the reference due to lack of cooperation from the assessee, but the Tribunal determined that the information provided was sufficient. The Tribunal ordered a fresh assessment in line with the provisions of section 50C, emphasizing the need for proper valuation by the DVO.

                            This detailed analysis of the judgment covers all the issues involved, providing a comprehensive overview of the legal aspects and decisions made by the Tribunal.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found