Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal Decision Upheld on Section 80IA Deduction: Advocates Must Respect Precedents</h1> <h3>The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1 Versus M/s. JWC Logistics Park Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-1 Versus M/s. JWC Logistics Park Pvt. Ltd. - [2018] 404 ITR 310 (Bom) Issues:Challenging the Tribunal's order allowing deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2008-09 and 2009-10. Dispute over the applicability of a CBDT Circular/Clarification dated 6th January, 2011.Analysis:Issue 1: Deduction under Section 80IAThe Appeals challenge the Tribunal's order allowing the deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Years 2008-09 and 2009-10. The Tribunal upheld the claim of deduction for the Container Freight Station (CFS) run by the respondent-assessee as an infrastructure facility. This decision was based on the view of the Commissioner of Income-Tax Appeals and supported by previous Tribunal decisions. The Tribunal refused to accept the Revenue's argument against the deduction, citing that the issue had been settled by previous decisions of the Tribunal and the High Court. The High Court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline and adherence to precedents. The Appeals challenging the deduction were dismissed.Issue 2: Applicability of CBDT Circular/ClarificationThe Advocate for the Revenue argued that a previous decision of the Court did not consider a CBDT Circular/Clarification dated 6th January, 2011, and therefore, the decision was incorrect. However, the Court clarified that the previous decision did refer to the Circular/Clarification and made a specific decision after considering it. The Court highlighted that decisions of Co-ordinate Benches are binding and any challenge should be taken to the Apex Court. The Advocate's attempt to reargue the settled issue without obtaining a stay from the Apex Court was criticized by the Court for wasting judicial time. The Court emphasized the need for advocates to act responsibly and respect legal precedents, avoiding unnecessary debates when issues are already settled. The Court dismissed the Appeals, reiterating the importance of uniform application of the law based on judicial discipline and precedents.In conclusion, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction under Section 80IA, emphasizing the importance of following legal precedents and maintaining judicial discipline. The Court dismissed the Appeals, highlighting the need for advocates to act responsibly and avoid rearguing settled issues without valid grounds.