Revenue's appeal dismissed, assessee's cross-objection partly allowed for promotional expenses claim.

The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal on all grounds and partly allowed the assessee's cross-objection, providing partial relief on the promotional expenses claim. The order was pronounced on 11th April, 2018.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition of Rs. 6,50,610/- being interest on loan disallowed by the AO.
2. Deletion of addition of Rs. 28,75,927/- on account of legal and professional expenses disallowed by the AO.
3. Deletion of addition of Rs. 9,90,545/- disallowed by the AO on account of foreign tour expenses.
4. Deletion of addition of Rs. 58,77,566/- disallowed by the AO on account of publicity expenses.
5. Confirmation of addition of Rs. 20,97,900/- claimed by the assessee on account of promotional expenses.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 6,50,610/- Being Interest on Loan Disallowed by the AO:
The AO disallowed Rs. 6,50,610/- out of the total interest on loan claimed by the assessee, comparing the interest paid in the current year with the previous year and noting a decrease in turnover. The assessee explained that the additional loan was used for capital work in progress due to renovation and modernization of the factory premises. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim after verifying the audited P&L Account and Balance Sheet, confirming the utilization of the loan for business purposes. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)’s decision, dismissing the revenue’s appeal.

2. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 28,75,927/- on Account of Legal and Professional Expenses Disallowed by the AO:
The AO disallowed Rs. 28,75,927/- claimed as legal and professional expenses, comparing it with the previous year’s expenses and questioning the necessity given the reduced turnover. The assessee explained that the expenses were incurred due to the engagement of retired professionals on a retainer basis to handle legal, HR, and other matters. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim, noting the verifiable details provided by the assessee and the necessity of such expenses for business purposes. The Tribunal agreed with the Ld. CIT(A) and upheld the decision, dismissing the revenue’s appeal.

3. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 9,90,545/- Disallowed by the AO on Account of Foreign Tour Expenses:
The AO disallowed Rs. 9,90,545/- claimed as foreign tour expenses, questioning the business connection and lack of documentary evidence. The assessee explained that the expenses were incurred by a Research Manager for exploring new sources of raw materials and technologies. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the air ticket expenses but restricted the boarding and lodging expenses, sustaining 20% of the disallowance. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)’s decision, noting the business purpose of the foreign tour, and dismissed the revenue’s appeal.

4. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 58,77,566/- Disallowed by the AO on Account of Publicity Expenses:
The AO disallowed Rs. 58,77,566/- claimed for purchasing physician samples, questioning the business necessity and citing non-deduction of TDS under section 194C. The assessee explained that the samples were purchased from M/s STP Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. to boost sales, and the transaction was on a principal-to-principal basis. The Ld. CIT(A) allowed the claim, noting that the provisions of section 194C were not applicable as the materials were sourced from a person other than the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)’s decision, confirming the factual findings and dismissing the revenue’s appeal.

5. Confirmation of Addition of Rs. 20,97,900/- Claimed by the Assessee on Account of Promotional Expenses:
The AO disallowed Rs. 20,97,900/- claimed for distributing gift articles, citing lack of agreements, confirmations from recipients, and an internal communication alleging bogus entries. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the disallowance. The assessee contended that the adverse material was not confronted with them and relied on judicial precedents for natural justice and consistency in allowing similar claims in previous years. The Tribunal noted the failure to provide the list of recipients and confirmations but acknowledged the purchase through banking channels. The Tribunal partially allowed the claim, restricting the disallowance to 30%.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal dismissed the revenue’s appeal on all grounds and partly allowed the assessee’s cross-objection, providing partial relief on the promotional expenses claim. The order was pronounced on 11th April, 2018.

---