Tribunal Overturns Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Emphasizes Limited Scope

Syniverse Technologies Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle-4 (1), Gurgaon

Syniverse Technologies Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Circle-4 (1), Gurgaon - TMI Issues:
- Addition on account of transfer pricing adjustment

Analysis:
The appeal was against the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) regarding the assessment year 2013-14, specifically challenging the addition on account of transfer pricing adjustment amounting to Rs. 16,26,63,782. The Assessing Officer made reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determining the arm’s length price (ALP) of the international transactions, particularly 'Provision of software development services'. The TPO rejected the separate operating profit margin declared by the assessee and calculated the transfer pricing adjustment based on the overall profit of the assessee. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) gave directions, leading to a revised transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 16,26,63,782. The primary issue raised was the validity of this transfer pricing adjustment.

The Tribunal observed that the TPO had considered total operating costs for both associated enterprises (AEs) and non-AEs while calculating the transfer pricing adjustment. However, the law restricts transfer pricing adjustments to international transactions with AEs only, not non-AEs. The Tribunal referred to judgments by the Delhi High Court and Bombay High Court to support this position. As the TPO had proposed adjustments for non-AE transactions as well, the Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the matter to the AO/TPO for a fresh decision, emphasizing adherence to the law and providing the assessee with a fair opportunity to present their case.

The Tribunal concluded that transfer pricing adjustments cannot be made on transactions with non-AEs and should be limited to international transactions with AEs. The matter was remanded to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration in accordance with the law and ensuring the assessee's right to a fair hearing. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the stay application was dismissed as infructuous. The assessee was granted a reasonable opportunity to present their case in the fresh proceedings.