Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether customs duty could be demanded on capital goods imported duty free by a 100% Export Oriented Unit on failure to fulfil export obligation; (ii) whether duty liability survived in respect of duty-free raw materials.
Issue (i): Whether customs duty could be demanded on capital goods imported duty free by a 100% Export Oriented Unit on failure to fulfil export obligation.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the settled view that the exemption scheme for capital goods permitted duty-free import for installation and use within the factory for manufacture of export goods, and that the duty demand on capital goods was not sustainable where the goods had in fact been installed and used for production. The reasoning distinguished capital goods from raw materials under the relevant exemption notification framework.
Conclusion: Duty was held not leviable on the capital goods, in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether duty liability survived in respect of duty-free raw materials.
Analysis: The appellant accepted liability to pay duty on the raw materials as per law. The impugned demand was not interfered with on this aspect.
Conclusion: Duty liability on the raw materials was sustained, against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was modified by deleting the duty demand on capital goods while sustaining the duty position on raw materials, and the appeal was allowed in part.
Ratio Decidendi: Where duty-free capital goods imported by an export-oriented unit are installed and used in the factory for manufacture of export goods, customs duty cannot be demanded merely because export obligation is not fully achieved; the duty consequence under the exemption scheme applies differently to raw materials.