Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Kerala High Court Orders GST Adjudication with Hearing Opportunity in Detention Case</h1> <h3>M/s. Poonam Grahnirman (P) Ltd. Versus The Assst. State Tax Officer, The Commissioner, State Goods And Service Tax Department And The State Of Kerala, Represented By The Secretary, Taxes Department, Trivandrum</h3> The High Court of Kerala directed the first respondent to complete adjudication under Section 129 of the GST Acts, granting the petitioner a hearing ... Detention of goods - case of the petitioner is that the driver of the vehicle in which the goods were carried omitted to hand over the documents when the goods were intercepted and the same were though furnished later, the detaining authority did not accept the same - Held that: - The correctness of the contentions raised by the petitioner cannot be decided in the proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India - the first respondent is directed to complete the adjudication provided for u/s 129 of the statutes - petition disposed off. The High Court of Kerala directed the first respondent to complete the adjudication under Section 129 of the GST Acts, providing the petitioner with a hearing opportunity within a week of the judgment. The detention of goods was due to transportation without records, which the petitioner claimed was due to the driver's omission. The court stated that the petitioner's contentions cannot be decided under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.