Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment orders under Section 27 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were valid when passed without granting personal hearing and without following the mandatory procedure of passing a speaking order.
Analysis: The impugned reassessment proceedings were based on inspection materials and the dealer had specifically sought time to reconcile accounts and requested personal hearing before final orders were passed. The Court held that no notice was issued fixing a date for decision and that the assessing authority, functioning as a quasi-judicial authority, was required to act independently, follow the mandatory procedure under Section 27(1) and 27(2) of the Act, and afford an opportunity of hearing before concluding the matter. The absence of personal hearing and the failure to pass a reasoned order rendered the assessment unsustainable.
Conclusion: The reassessment orders were set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered after issuing notice, granting personal hearing, and passing a speaking order in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A quasi-judicial tax assessment made without affording personal hearing and without a reasoned speaking order, where such procedural safeguards are required, is invalid for breach of natural justice and statutory procedure.