Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application dated 21.09.2015 could be treated as a rectification application under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and whether the writ order dismissing the challenge to the assessment order was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: Section 84 permits rectification only of an error apparent on the face of the record through the prescribed statutory mechanism. The application relied upon by the assessee was only one seeking withdrawal of the notice of demand in Form-RR and was not a statutory rectification petition under Section 84. In that view, the earlier writ order proceeded on an unsustainable footing. The parties were also permitted to place fresh pleadings and documents before the writ Court for reconsideration of the dispute, including the impact of Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Conclusion: The application was held not to be a rectification application under Section 84, the writ order was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration.