TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Income from Shares Classified as Business Income: Tribunal Emphasizes Intention & Profit Motive.</h1> <h3>Smt. Anju Gaggar Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 10 (1), Hyderabad</h3> Smt. Anju Gaggar Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 10 (1), Hyderabad - TMI Issues:Assessment of income as business income instead of short term capital gain, nature of transactions in shares, determination of investor vs. trader status.Analysis:The case involved an appeal by the assessee against an order confirming the assessment treating income from purchase and sale of shares as business income instead of short term capital gain. The AO observed that the assessee had a pattern of purchasing and selling shares within short periods, utilizing interest-free loans, and engaging in daily transactions, indicating a trading pattern. The AO also highlighted similar judgments involving family members of the assessee where transactions were considered business activities. The assessee argued for investor status citing valuation methods and delivery-based transactions. The Tribunal noted that the revenue had not consistently treated the assessee as an investor in previous assessments, and emphasized the need to consider various factors beyond transaction frequency to determine trading nature. The Tribunal referenced a case allowing for both investment and trading portfolios, emphasizing the significance of intention, profit motive, turnover, and source of funds in classification. Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the order treating the assessee as a trader based on the pattern of transactions and the nature of holdings, dismissing the appeal. The decision aligned with previous judgments involving similar transactional patterns.This comprehensive analysis addresses the issues raised in the judgment, covering the assessment methodology, nature of transactions, and the determination of investor vs. trader status, providing a detailed understanding of the legal reasoning and precedents considered by the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 