We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Supreme Court Clarifies Tribunal Chairpersons Appointment Process & Sets Fixed Tenure The Supreme Court clarified the appointment process for Chairpersons of Tribunals, directing the Central Government to consult with the Chief Justice of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The Supreme Court clarified the appointment process for Chairpersons of Tribunals, directing the Central Government to consult with the Chief Justice of India. It set a fixed tenure of five years for Chairpersons and Members of all Tribunals. Members in the NCDRC had their terms extended until 31.05.2018 to facilitate ongoing appointments. The Court emphasized the uninterrupted progress of the selection process and prohibited litigation on the matter, to be addressed at the final hearing. In W.P.(C)No.279/2017, timelines were set for filing affidavits, with final disposal scheduled for the second week of July 2018.
Issues: 1. Clarification of the previous order dated 09.02.2018 regarding appointment of Chairpersons of Tribunals. 2. Selection process for Judicial Members of the Central Administrative Tribunal. 3. Tenure of Chairpersons and Members of Tribunals. 4. Continuation of Members in National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC). 5. Progress of the selection process and prohibition of litigation.
Clarification of the Previous Order: The Supreme Court, in response to an application for clarification of the previous order dated 09.02.2018, decided on several key terms. Firstly, it was ruled that the appointment of Chairpersons of the Tribunals should be made by the Central Government in consultation with the Chief Justice of India. Secondly, the Search-cum-Selection Committee for the appointment of Judicial Members of the Central Administrative Tribunal was directed to proceed with the selection of Administrative Members as well. Thirdly, the tenure of Chairpersons and Members of all Tribunals was fixed at five years or the maximum age determined under the old Acts and Rules. Lastly, a Committee for the selection of Members of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal was instructed to continue its work as per the previous order.
Continuation of Members in NCDRC: Regarding the Members continuing in the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), it was noted that their terms had been allowed to continue until 15th March, 2018. The Court, upon the submission of the petitioner/applicants' counsels, extended the term of these Members, including the Chairperson, until 31.05.2018. It was emphasized that appointments should be made during this period, and the ongoing selection process should proceed without any hindrance.
Progress of Selection Process and Prohibition of Litigation: The Court reiterated that the selection process for various positions in the Tribunals should continue uninterrupted. It was explicitly stated that no litigation concerning the selection process would be entertained, and any grievances in this regard should be addressed during the final hearing of the main case. The Court disposed of the application accordingly.
W.P.(C)No.279/2017: Additionally, in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 279 of 2017, the Court directed the filing of a counter affidavit within four weeks and a rejoinder affidavit within three weeks thereafter. The writ petition was scheduled for final disposal in the second week of July 2018, indicating the timeline for further proceedings in the case.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.