TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, for service tax paid by cheque, the date of presentation of the cheque is to be treated as the date of payment, so as to negate demand of interest for the intervening period; (ii) Whether the appellate order required interference and remand for failure to consider the documents produced by the appellant.
Issue (i): Whether, for service tax paid by cheque, the date of presentation of the cheque is to be treated as the date of payment, so as to negate demand of interest for the intervening period.
Analysis: Rule 6(2A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 provides that where service tax is deposited by cheque, the date of presentation of the cheque to the designated bank shall be deemed to be the date on which service tax has been paid, subject to realization of the cheque. The appellant had paid the tax through cheque on the due dates, and the subsequent realization of the cheque did not alter the deemed date of payment.
Conclusion: The date of presentation of the cheque was treated as the date of payment of service tax, and the demand of interest for the intervening period was held not sustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether the appellate order required interference and remand for failure to consider the documents produced by the appellant.
Analysis: The record showed that the appellant had furnished the relevant documents before the appellate authority prior to the order being passed, yet those materials were not considered while rejecting the claim. Since the documents were material to verification of the appellant's case, the matter required reconsideration on the basis of those records.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority for fresh consideration of the documents and for passing a fresh order in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: Relief was granted on the interest issue, and the remaining dispute was sent back for reconsideration by the appellate authority.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Rule 6(2A) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, where service tax is paid by cheque, the date of presentation of the cheque is deemed to be the date of payment, and material evidence relevant to the claim must be considered before confirming liability.
TaxTMI 
