Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings were invalid where the reasons to believe and notice under section 148 were issued by an Assessing Officer who did not have jurisdiction over the assessee's case.
Analysis: The reassessment was initiated by an officer who admittedly lacked jurisdiction, while the case was later transferred to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Section 147 permits assessment or reassessment only when the Assessing Officer having the relevant jurisdiction forms a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. Section 148(1) likewise requires the notice to be issued by the Assessing Officer. Read with section 2(7A), the statutory scheme makes jurisdictional competence a condition precedent for both recording reasons and issuing notice. Since those foundational steps were taken by an without jurisdiction, the initiation itself was contrary to law and could not sustain the subsequent proceedings.
Conclusion: The reasons recorded and the notice issued by the non-jurisdictional officer were invalid, the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio, and the addition stood quashed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, read with section 2(7A), only the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction can validly record reasons to believe and issue notice for reassessment; action by a non-jurisdictional officer is void ab initio.