1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Sureties for Corporate Debtors also Personal Guarantors under Bankruptcy Code: Moratorium Protects All Parties</h1> The court clarified that individuals acting as sureties for corporate debtors are considered 'Personal Guarantors' under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy ... Stay of proceedings under SARFAESI Act 2002, including the auction notice - 'Moratoriumβ applicability to the property of the βCorporate Debtorβ - Approval of resolution plan - βFinancial Creditorβ, including Appellant-State Bank of India to proceed against the βPersonal Guarantorβ of the βCorporate Debtorβ - Held that:- Only institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the βCorporate Debtorβ are prohibited from proceedings, in terms of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the βI&B Codeβ, transfer, encumbrance, alienation or disposal of any of its assets of the βCorporate Debtorβ and/ or any legal right or beneficial interest therein are prohibited. Clauses (c) & (d) of sub-section (1) of Section 14 of the βI&B Codeβ prohibits recovery or enforcement of any security interest created by the corporate debtor in respect of its property including the property occupied by it or in the possession of the βCorporate Debtorβ. βResolution Planβ if approved by the βCommittee of Creditorsβ under sub-section (4) of Section 30 and if the same meets the requirements as referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 30 and once approved by the βAdjudicating Authorityβ is not only binding on the βCorporate Debtorβ, but also on its employees, members, creditors, guarantors and other stakeholders involved in the βResolution Planβ, including the βPersonal Guarantorβ. Thus we hold that the βMoratoriumβ will not only be applicable to the property of the βCorporate Debtorβ but also on the βPersonal Guarantorβ. Appeal dismissed. Issues:1. Interpretation of the term 'Personal Guarantor' under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.2. Applicability of moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code on personal guarantors.3. Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority in cases involving personal guarantors of corporate debtors.Analysis:Issue 1: Interpretation of the term 'Personal Guarantor'The judgment delves into the definition of 'Personal Guarantor' as per sub-section (22) of Section 5 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It establishes that an individual who acts as a surety in a contract of guarantee to a corporate debtor falls within the ambit of a 'Personal Guarantor' under the Code.Issue 2: Applicability of moratorium on personal guarantorsThe judgment explores the impact of the moratorium declared by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. It emphasizes that the moratorium not only prohibits actions against the corporate debtor but also extends to the personal guarantor, restraining any transfer, encumbrance, or disposal of assets by the personal guarantor during the moratorium period.Issue 3: Jurisdiction of the Adjudicating AuthorityRegarding the jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority in cases involving personal guarantors of corporate debtors, the judgment clarifies that if insolvency proceedings are initiated against a corporate debtor, simultaneous proceedings against the personal guarantor must be filed before the same Adjudicating Authority. This ensures a cohesive approach in resolving insolvency matters related to both the corporate debtor and the personal guarantor.The judgment underscores the interconnectedness of insolvency proceedings involving corporate debtors and personal guarantors, highlighting the need for a unified approach before the Adjudicating Authority. It emphasizes the comprehensive application of the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, extending its protective umbrella not only to corporate debtors but also to personal guarantors. The interpretation of key legal definitions and provisions ensures clarity in understanding the rights and obligations of parties involved in insolvency proceedings, contributing to a more structured and consistent legal framework.